Tuesday, September 28, 2010

To Be Or Not To Be

So, welcome another controversy in the CWG mess .. The Prince of Wales is coming down to open the Games instead of the Queen and the Indian Govt., at the 11th hour, is crazy and "sentimental" about the national pride for it wants the President of India to open the Games rather than the Prince.


Fair enough in the normal parlance, alright, but keeping in mind the CWG, I feel it is a move to divert the attention of the body politic from the mess the Government has made of the Games in general.


They are crying because in the present scenario, the Prince would open the Games and the President would stand beside him. There are a few things which are to be kept in mind in order to understand the whole thing. First of all, Indian Government knew this in advance. They didn't do a thing about that and are raising this issue now when there is not even a week left to officially open the Games. It would lead to nothing but would add more muck to already existing - Nothing but a diplomatic mess.


Secondly, I agree that it would be nice that the President opens the Games but we also have to understand the structure of the Commonwealth as an organization. Indian Government, and also the Indian people, are saying that letting the Prince open the Games is an indication of the colonial past, we are now about half a century ahead of the past and are well democratic and what not. The answer to this is that you cannot blow hot and cold in the same breath. The very existence of the Commonwealth is a relic of the colonial rule as all the members are former colonies and the Head of the Commonwealth is, by default, the Monarch of Great Britain or any appointed member of the Royal family -- Duke of Edinburgh was the Head of Commonwealth at a point of time and may be even now, I am not sure. By being a member of the Commonwealth, we are laden by ourselves with the memories of our past. If we are so particular about our independent existence and our sovereignty, it is better that we distance ourselves from the Commonwealth and cease to be a member. The day we do so, we are entitled to claim the authority of our President as of right. But till we are the members of Commonwealth, its better we stick to its protocol.


Thirdly, it is being said that if the Queen were coming, it would have been a different thing but now, as the Prince is coming, it is better we let our President do the needful and we should be strong enough to let our thoughts out. We should understand the capacity in which the Prince is coming and would be opening the CWG. He is coming as the REPRESENTATIVE OF THE QUEEN and would be reading the QUEEN'S MESSAGE !!! He is NOT opening the Games as the Prince of Wales, for God's Sake !!!! Technically, the representative has the similar status and the authority as the original incumbent. Its better that we understand the finer nuances rather than getting into small trifles.


Lastly, I was listening in a TV talk that if it were for the Queen to do the honors, WHY DID SHE NOT COME ?!? Did she have anything more important than to open the CWG ? Well, it is again a minor one as it is the tradition of the Royal families that every year, the events to come up are designated to various member of the royal household depending upon their seniority (The Prince of Wales is the senior most after the Monarch and his / her spouse, anyway) as the Monarch cannot attend each and every one of them. We should remember that Princess Elizabeth (Now Queen Elizabeth II) represented her father a number of times as his representative. And if, at all, we are concerned as to why the Queen did not come, it can be best answered by our Commonwealth Committee and their evident management of the CWG !!!


If our public understood the structure and nuances of the Organization, I am sure these minor questions would not have arisen at the verge of the opening of the CWG. They may think of me as devoid of national pride, but that is not the case. Along with my national pride, I would prefer and would request my fellow countrymen to give other its due share as well.


So, before being carried away, it is better to understand the structures rather than crying foul for no reason or, at least, when we have bigger reasons in front of us.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Animals And Humans

Today my cousin posted a video of dogs. No doubt, they were adorable as usual. But, when I reached the end of that video, it gave rise to a question in my mind. This video was promoting the adoption of an animal from a local pet shelter and the question in my mind was WHETHER WE HUMANS DESERVE THE TRUE LOVE OF THESE POOR BEINGS ?!?

They love us without wishing anything in return and we just dump them out because, one fine morning, WE MAY NOT WANT THEM OR THEY MAY BE PROVING TO BE A LIABILITY !!!!

Such buggers need to think that this animal is loving you truly without even knowing who you are. Even your own son may despise you once you grow old but this animal would be there with you even when you are on your funeral pyre. I am not talking about dogs but every animal for that reason.

And if not for any other reason, to be curt, RESPECT them just because animals are far more superior than humans. Just walking on two feet does not make us better. Even a monkey can walk on two feet but when it comes to solidarity between their group, even they are better than us. When it comes to labour, even a donkey can leave us miles behind. We cannot sense the love of dear ones and animals can sense the earthquakes coming and they migrate. Every individual animal has a quality which we humans would continue to say -- WE DON'T HAVE !!!

They might say that humans are better because we have got DEVELOPED MIND !!!! Considering the condition which we have made of our earth and nature, it is an answer in itself, I need not comment on that !!

MTC